I tend to go for squarish diamonds over roundish, but there are exceptions. And this Edwardian solitaire engagement ring is one of them.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb3bd/bb3bda189a4568296783e8087549ab08b1d7f1a6" alt="2.90 carat antique cushion-cut diamond engagement ring, circa 1915. Via Diamonds in the Library."
Isn’t it great? It was made in 1915. I think the contrast of that 2.90 carat antique cushion-cut diamond with the delicately engraved platinum ring is wonderful. It has a gorgeous gallery, too.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b24b0/b24b02a0c186fbd7da03bb09c99da8ca6408643c" alt="2.90 carat antique cushion-cut diamond engagement ring, circa 1915. Side view. Via Diamonds in the Library."
It’s a little tricky to tell, but the filigree of the gallery actually forms a fleur-de-lys motif. And please note that that hand-engraving goes absolutely all around the ring.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0bee/a0beec0fe62162bf9c1bda686376dde37aec4ce2" alt="2.90 carat antique cushion-cut diamond engagement ring, circa 1915. Alternate view. Via Diamonds in the Library."
The Lang Antiques’ description sums up this antique cushion-cut diamond engagement ring by saying, “Understated elegance par excellence.” 2.90 carats is a lot of sparkle power for “understated,” but I still think the phrase suits the design of the ring, if not the size of the diamond, perfectly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42abb/42abb8a60e703d8ff4b419b30d8ebfd0b5bbdbe4" alt="A 2.90 carat antique cushion-cut diamond engagement ring, circa 1915. Via Diamonds in the Library."
This antique cushion-cut diamond engagement ring is currently for sale at Lang Antiques. All images and info are thanks to Lang.
Your posts always leave me breathless!
That’s my goal! 🙂